Every City in the USA

Census Vintage 2025 · City growth atlas

2025 U.S. City Growth Atlas

Census Vintage 2025 population estimates for 19,483 U.S. cities and places, reference date July 1, 2025. A national percentage-change map, resident-count comparison map, fastest growth, biggest numeric gains, state briefs, milestone crossings, and reusable downloads for reporters and editors.

For reporters: the ZIP includes PNG/SVG maps, chart exports, captions, alt text, source manifest, data dictionary, and CSVs.

Read before using

Reporter trust notes

What the numbers are

These are Census Bureau Vintage 2025 July 1 population estimates. The Census embargo notice listed Thursday, May 14, 2026 at 12:01 a.m. ET as the public release time for the city and town estimates.

The Atlas compares July 1, 2024 and July 1, 2025 estimates inside the same vintage. It is not a net-migration table, a decennial count, or a long-run trend line.

How to cite it

Cite the Census Bureau as the primary source for population estimates. Cite Every City in the USA when using our rankings, maps, state packets, chart exports, or joined story leads.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates. Graphics and analysis: Every City in the USA. Reuse allowed under CC BY 4.0; note if modified.

Universe and map count

This page contains 19,483 city/place rows and the all-city map draws 19,483 dots. Clean contiguous U.S. crops omit Alaska and Hawaii by design.

The Census city/town release includes multiple local-government geography types; this Atlas uses the site's processed city/place universe. See methodology before using it as a geography-definition source.

Official context: Census city/town estimate release notice · Vintage 2025 release notes · site methodology.

Where city populations changed fastest by percentage

Featured map · circle area = percent change

This lead view scales each city dot by one-year percentage change instead of residents gained or lost. It surfaces small-base places that barely register on the resident-count map, so use it alongside population and numeric change.

Map of U.S. cities with green dots for one-year percentage population gains, rust dots for one-year percentage population declines, and gray dots for cities with no one-year change.
Percentage change is calculated as 2025 population minus 2024 population, divided by 2024 population. Small populations can produce visually large percentage swings from modest numeric changes.
Annotated All-city percentage-change map Every mapped city: color shows direction and circle area shows one-year percent change SVGPNG
16:9 clean Contiguous U.S. percentage hero map 16:9 clean crop scaled by percent change, with no labels, legend, Alaska, or Hawaii SVGPNG
1200x630 Contiguous U.S. percentage social map 1200 by 630 clean crop for social cards and article thumbnails SVGPNG
1:1 clean Contiguous U.S. percentage square map Square clean crop for embeds and social variants SVGPNG
% gains Percentage gainers emphasis map Percentage population gains highlighted; flat and declining cities shown as gray context SVGPNG
% declines Percentage declines emphasis map Percentage population declines highlighted; flat and growing cities shown as gray context SVGPNG
5%+ moves Large percentage moves map Only cities that gained or lost at least 5% from 2024 to 2025 SVGPNG

Compare that with resident-count change

19,483 mapped cities · circle area = residents

The resident-count map uses the same city dots and colors, but circle area shows the number of residents added or lost. Large cities and high absolute moves dominate this view, which is why it reads differently from the percentage map.

Percentage Area shows one-year percent change Small fast-moving cities become visible, including large percentage gains and losses.
Resident count Area shows residents gained or lost Large cities and high absolute moves dominate this view.
Map of U.S. cities with green dots for one-year population gains, rust dots for one-year population declines, and gray dots for cities with no one-year change.
Total population change includes births, deaths, and migration; it is not a net-migration measure.
Annotated All-city gain/loss map Every mapped city: green gain, rust decline, gray no one-year change SVGPNG
16:9 clean Contiguous U.S. hero map 16:9 clean crop with no labels, legend, Alaska, or Hawaii SVGPNG
1200x630 Contiguous U.S. social map 1200 by 630 clean crop for social cards and article thumbnails SVGPNG
1:1 clean Contiguous U.S. square map Square clean crop for embeds and social variants SVGPNG
Gains Gainers emphasis map Population gains highlighted; flat and declining cities shown as gray context SVGPNG
Declines Declines emphasis map Population declines highlighted; flat and growing cities shown as gray context SVGPNG
1k+ moves Large moves map Only cities that gained or lost at least 1,000 residents from 2024 to 2025 SVGPNG

State map sets

50 states · 4 exports each

Pick a state to load its clean percentage-change lead map plus annotated percentage and resident-count alternatives. Circle areas are scaled within each state; use the national maps above for cross-state visual scale.

Alabama AL

463 mapped cities
Alabama clean city population percentage-change map, with green dots for gains, rust dots for declines, and gray dots for no one-year change.
Clean % Percent clean SVGPNG
Annotated % Percent annotated Title, source, legend, and percentage-scaled city dots. SVGPNG
Clean # Resident clean Shape and dots only; circle area shows residents gained or lost. SVGPNG
Annotated # Resident annotated Title, source, legend, and resident-count-scaled city dots. SVGPNG

Top findings

Fastest growth, biggest gain, milestone watch

Fastest over 20k

Celina, TX

+24.6%

51,717 to 64,427, a one-year change of +12,710.

Biggest numeric gain

Charlotte, NC

+20,731

944,053 to 964,784 from July 2024 to July 2025.

Milestone watch

6 crossings

Austin, TX crossed 1,000,000. Raleigh, NC crossed 500,000. Longmont, CO, Edmond, OK, Avondale, AZ crossed 100,000. Garland, TX fell below 250,000.

Find your local angle

Assignment desk starting points

The fastest way in is local: pick a state, compare the biggest positive gainer with the fastest qualifying city, then check milestones and one-year declines before pitching a growth story.

State briefs for local follow-up

50 states + DC · per-state CSVs

A per-state summary built for assignment editors: fastest qualifying city, biggest positive numeric gainer, largest current city, largest one-year decline where present, and a state-specific CSV for local sorting.

State Cities Fastest over 20k Growth Biggest gain Added Largest decline Lost State data
Alabama 463 Foley +7.8% Madison +4,157 Birmingham -896 CSV
Alaska 149 Juneau +0.1% Bethel +269 Anchorage -214 CSV
Arizona 91 Queen Creek +8.2% Surprise +7,702 Tucson -2,262 CSV
Arkansas 501 Centerton +5.7% Fayetteville +2,908 Pine Bluff -540 CSV
California 483 Lathrop +4.7% San Diego +5,874 Los Angeles -3,621 CSV
Colorado 272 Johnstown +8.4% Colorado Springs +2,288 Centennial -1,154 CSV
Connecticut 30 Norwalk +0.8% New Haven +886 Meriden -52 CSV
Delaware 57 Middletown +1.0% Milford +649 Newark -63 CSV
District of Columbia 1 Washington +0.3% Washington +2,335 n/a n/a CSV
Florida 411 Haines City +10.0% Port St. Lucie +9,131 Hialeah -2,210 CSV
Georgia 538 Canton +7.0% Atlanta +8,350 Athens -829 CSV
Hawaii 1 Honolulu -0.2% n/a n/a Honolulu -523 CSV
Idaho 198 Kuna +8.4% Caldwell +3,452 Hailey -93 CSV
Illinois 1,294 Lockport +3.4% Chicago +5,253 Decatur -524 CSV
Indiana 566 Westfield +5.3% Westfield +3,341 Hammond -305 CSV
Iowa 939 Waukee +9.3% Waukee +2,963 Spencer -227 CSV
Kansas 625 Junction City +2.4% Olathe +1,361 Leavenworth -230 CSV
Kentucky 418 Elizabethtown +2.8% Lexington-Fayette urban county +2,680 Hopkinsville -450 CSV
Louisiana 305 Hammond +2.9% Baton Rouge +1,255 New Orleans -1,323 CSV
Maine 23 Auburn +0.8% Auburn +210 Presque Isle -59 CSV
Maryland 157 Frederick +3.0% Frederick +2,713 Gaithersburg -432 CSV
Massachusetts 58 Everett +4.6% Everett +2,362 Boston -1,338 CSV
Michigan 533 East Lansing +1.3% Detroit +5,060 Dearborn -405 CSV
Minnesota 856 Rosemount +4.2% Rosemount +1,299 Eagan -222 CSV
Mississippi 299 Gulfport +2.2% Gulfport +1,624 Jackson -846 CSV
Missouri 936 Republic +5.9% Kansas City +4,681 St. Louis -2,301 CSV
Montana 127 Kalispell +2.0% Missoula +718 Billings -206 CSV
Nebraska 528 Norfolk +1.3% Lincoln +2,257 Omaha -450 CSV
Nevada 19 Fernley +2.7% Henderson +5,379 Boulder City -70 CSV
New Hampshire 13 Dover +2.1% Dover +720 Keene -47 CSV
New Jersey 323 Fair Lawn +2.4% Newark +3,646 Camden -249 CSV
New Mexico 105 Rio Rancho +1.8% Rio Rancho +1,972 Albuquerque -2,290 CSV
New York 594 Kiryas Joel +6.6% Kiryas Joel +2,933 New York -12,196 CSV
North Carolina 549 Monroe +6.2% Charlotte +20,731 Asheville -1,626 CSV
North Dakota 355 Williston +2.4% Fargo +1,088 Valley City -61 CSV
Ohio 924 Grove City +2.9% Columbus +7,696 Toledo -962 CSV
Oklahoma 591 El Reno +3.3% Oklahoma City +6,104 Enid -232 CSV
Oregon 240 Woodburn +4.9% Woodburn +1,495 McMinnville -556 CSV
Pennsylvania 1,014 Chambersburg +1.5% Philadelphia +1,546 Erie -449 CSV
Rhode Island 8 Warwick +0.9% Providence +1,068 Newport -161 CSV
South Carolina 271 Greer +7.3% Greer +3,412 Mount Pleasant -518 CSV
South Dakota 310 Brookings +2.0% Sioux Falls +3,862 Vermillion -123 CSV
Tennessee 345 Lebanon +5.6% Nashville +9,281 Memphis -4,575 CSV
Texas 1,224 Celina +24.6% Fort Worth +19,512 El Paso -2,219 CSV
Utah 255 Eagle Mountain +8.5% Eagle Mountain +5,195 Orem -1,128 CSV
Vermont 39 Burlington -0.3% Essex Junction +217 South Burlington -184 CSV
Virginia 227 Fairfax +2.8% Richmond +2,450 Danville -311 CSV
Washington 281 Kirkland +3.0% Seattle +11,572 Airway Heights -128 CSV
West Virginia 230 Morgantown -0.1% Ranson corporation +809 Wheeling -322 CSV
Wisconsin 608 Middleton +2.6% Madison +1,955 Milwaukee -915 CSV
Wyoming 99 Cheyenne +1.1% Cheyenne +734 Rock Springs -79 CSV

For all states in one file, use the state reporter packets CSV.

Two ways to rank growth

Percent change and raw residents added

Biggest numeric gainers

The ten cities that added the most residents in raw numbers between the 2024 and 2025 estimates.

Charlotte, NC added +20,731 residents, the largest one-year numeric gain in this slice. Numeric gain reflects total population change, not net migration.

Milestone crossings

6 threshold crossings

Cities that crossed a round-number population threshold between the 2024 and 2025 estimates.

Crossed above 100,000

Longmont, CO

99,600 to 100,109 (+509).

Crossed above 100,000

Edmond, OK

99,101 to 100,479 (+1,378).

Crossed above 100,000

Avondale, AZ

96,646 to 100,983 (+4,337).

Fell below 250,000

Garland, TX

251,034 to 249,625 (-1,409).

Crossed above 500,000

Raleigh, NC

499,017 to 506,306 (+7,289).

Crossed above 1,000,000

Austin, TX

998,607 to 1,002,632 (+4,025).

Declines and rebounds

Large-city declines and one-year reversals

Comedown to comeback

Cities with at least 50,000 residents in 2025 that declined from 2023 to 2024, then gained population from 2024 to 2025.

City 2023 to 2024 2024 to 2025 Swing
Peoria, AZ -24 +2,146 +2,170
Tempe, AZ -818 +1,195 +2,013
Richardson, TX -762 +570 +1,332
Bloomington, IN -519 +727 +1,246
Ann Arbor, MI -438 +786 +1,224

Rank movement worth checking

Top 100 current or prior population ranks

Moved up 6 ranks

McKinney, TX

#105 in 2024 to #99 in 2025.

Moved down 4 ranks

Hialeah, FL

#98 in 2024 to #102 in 2025.

Moved down 2 ranks

Irving, TX

#89 in 2024 to #91 in 2025.

Moved down 2 ranks

St. Paul, MN

#67 in 2024 to #69 in 2025.

Story leads reporters can localize

Census V2025 joined to official context datasets

These are assignment-ready angles, not causal claims. Each lead pairs the new city growth estimates with one official context dataset and carries its caveat beside the chart idea.

01

Opportunity + broadband

Growth cities with WFH and broadband context

Three high-income growth cities where work-from-home shares clear 35% and provider-reported gigabit availability is high. This is context for reporting, not a causal explanation for growth.

  • Celina, TX: +276.8% since 2020, +24.6% in one year, 35.8% WFH, $170,894 median household income, 88.2% gigabit availability.
  • Frisco, TX has 37.8% WFH and 90.3% gigabit; Redmond, WA has 38.4% WFH and 99.1% gigabit.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS 2020-2024, FCC BDC 2025-06-30. FCC is provider-reported availability, not adoption, speed, or price; this does not prove remote work caused growth.

Chart comparing Celina, Frisco, and Redmond across population growth, work-from-home share, median household income, and gigabit availability.
Opportunity stack strips: growth, WFH share, income, and gigabit availability. SVGPNG
Celina portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Frisco portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Redmond portrait SVG · PNG in media kit
02

Affordability

Regional lower-cost fast-growth candidates outside Texas

A counterpoint to the Texas growth story: fast-growing cities in regions where BEA price levels still sit below the national average.

  • Centerton, AR: +52.1% since 2020, all-items RPP 91.4, rent RPP 76.9, cash-rent burden 26.4%, home-value-to-income 2.9.
  • Waukee, IA: +45.7% since 2020, all-items RPP 91.7, rent RPP 84.7, cash-rent burden 32.9%, home-value-to-income 3.5.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS 2020-2024, BEA 2024 RPP. RPP is metro or state-nonmetro geography, not city-level affordability.

Chart comparing Centerton and Waukee across growth, regional price parity, cash-rent burden, and home-value-to-income ratios.
Growth vs. affordability quadrant with a U.S. = 100 RPP reference line. SVGPNG
Centerton portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Waukee portrait SVG · PNG in media kit
03

Climate context

Fast growth in heat-risk geography

Phoenix-area cities kept adding residents in places where July normal highs clear 105 F and FEMA risk context is very high.

  • Goodyear, AZ: +7,690 residents (+6.5%), July normal high 105.5 F, Maricopa County FEMA NRI 99.9.
  • Buckeye, AZ added +6,552 (+5.5%) at a 106.3 F July normal high; Surprise, AZ added +7,702 (+4.6%) at 105.2 F.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, NOAA 1991-2020 normals, FEMA NRI. This is context, not a forecast or property-level risk claim.

Chart comparing Goodyear, Buckeye, and Surprise across one-year population gain, FEMA heat-wave risk, and NOAA July maximum temperature normals.
Heat-growth grid: one-year population gain with July normal-high overlay. SVGPNG
Goodyear portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Buckeye portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Surprise portrait SVG · PNG in media kit
04

Housing pressure

Big-city growth with shelter-cost context

Large numeric gainers do not share the same affordability reality once rent burden, home-value-to-income ratios, and regional rent prices are layered in.

  • Charlotte added +20,731 residents with 47.8% cash-rent burden, home-value-to-income 4.7, and rent RPP 97.6.
  • Fort Worth added +19,512 with 53.7% cash-rent burden and rent RPP 117.9; Seattle added +11,572 with 42.4% cash-rent burden, rent RPP 151.3, and home-value-to-income 7.6.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS 2020-2024, BEA RPP. BEA RPP is regional, not city-grain; population growth alone does not measure housing shortage.

Chart comparing Charlotte, Fort Worth, and Seattle across one-year population gain, cash-rent burden, home-value-to-income, and rent RPP.
Ranked housing-stress bars beside one-year population gain. SVGPNG
Charlotte portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Fort Worth portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Seattle portrait SVG · PNG in media kit
05

Commute context

Exurban growth with long-commute context

Growth in commuter exurbs becomes a daily time-burden story when a large share of non-WFH workers report 60-minute-plus trips.

  • Menifee, CA grew +15.7% since 2020 with 25.4% of non-WFH commuters at 60+ minutes; Manteca, CA grew +15.7% with 25.0%.
  • Kyle, TX grew +53.0% since 2020, with 16.2% at 60+ minutes and 2.9% city LAUS unemployment.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS commute tables, BLS LAUS. ACS commute time excludes WFH workers and carries margins of error.

Chart comparing Menifee, Manteca, and Kyle across 2020 to 2025 population growth and 60-minute-plus commute shares among non-work-from-home commuters.
Commute pressure ladder for non-WFH workers. SVGPNG
Menifee portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Manteca portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Kyle portrait SVG · PNG in media kit
06

High-income suburbs

High-income suburbs that lost residents

A clean localizable counter-story: affluent suburbs can still post one-year population declines. Local reporting should test whether housing age, prices, household size, or estimate noise is part of the explanation.

  • Thousand Oaks, CA lost 1,387 residents from 2024 to 2025 with ACS median household income of $135,603.
  • Sugar Land, TX lost 1,211; Huntington Beach, CA lost 1,168; Centennial, CO lost 1,154.
  • Carlsbad, Santa Clarita, Redondo Beach, and Newport Beach also show high household incomes beside one-year losses.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025 and ACS 2020-2024 median household income. One-year decline is total estimated population change, not a migration count or causal housing claim.

Chart ranking Thousand Oaks, Sugar Land, Huntington Beach, Centennial, Carlsbad, Santa Clarita, Redondo Beach, and Newport Beach by one-year population loss and median household income.
Ranked loss-and-income bars for eight high-income suburban cities. SVGPNG
Thousand Oaks portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Sugar Land portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Huntington Beach portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Centennial portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Carlsbad portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Santa Clarita portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Redondo Beach portrait SVG · PNG in media kit Newport Beach portrait SVG · PNG in media kit

Source links

Reporter downloads

Grouped by newsroom use

Files reflect the same Vintage 2025 release as the full dataset. Use the data dictionary and source manifest when auditing fields or explaining joined context datasets to an editor.

Graphics desks

Use SVG for editing and PNG for fast CMS drops.

Free reuse and attribution

Every City in the USA graphics, rankings, story leads, and copy blocks on this page may be copied, republished, cropped, resized, modified, translated, and used commercially under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Attribution can be any reasonable credit for the medium. For online use, include a link to https://www.everycityintheusa.com/atlas/2025-us-city-growth/; if you alter a graphic or excerpt, note that it was modified. Keep the Census source, Vintage 2025 label, reference date, and one-year estimate caveat with the material.

Suggested credit: Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates. Graphics and analysis: Every City in the USA, licensed CC BY 4.0.

Reporter kit

Suggested attribution and reusable copy blocks

Suggested attribution

Every City in the USA, "2025 U.S. City Growth Atlas," https://www.everycityintheusa.com/atlas/2025-us-city-growth/. Graphics and analysis licensed CC BY 4.0. Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, Vintage 2025 city and place estimates (reference date 2025-07-01).

Methodology note

All figures come from the U.S. Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program, Vintage 2025 city and place file, with a reference date of July 1, 2025. Percent-growth tables are limited to cities with at least 20,000 residents in the 2024 estimate to avoid small-base distortions. All comparisons are within the Vintage 2025 series, so 2024 and 2025 figures are directly comparable.

Caveat: These are total population change figures from a single Census estimate vintage. They are not migration counts, and a one-year change is not a trend.

Do not say: “moved in,” “migration surge,” or “official fastest-growing city in America” unless your story independently supports that wording. The Atlas ranks a documented slice of the Census release.

Copy-paste lede templates

{CITY}, {STATE} added {NUMERIC_CHANGE} residents between July 2024 and July 2025, reaching {POP_2025}, according to Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates.

{CITY}, {STATE} grew {PERCENT_CHANGE} from July 2024 to July 2025 among cities with at least 20,000 residents in the 2024 estimate.

{CITY}, {STATE} crossed {THRESHOLD} residents in the Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates, reaching {POP_2025} as of July 1, 2025.

{CITY}, {STATE} recorded a one-year population decline of {NUMERIC_DECLINE}, from {POP_2024} in 2024 to {POP_2025} in 2025.

In {STATE}, the fastest-growing city over 20,000 residents was {CITY}, which grew {PERCENT_CHANGE} from 2024 to 2025.

Share graphic briefs

Static chart copy for social and newsletters

Methodology · read before comparing

Within-vintage growth only.

The Atlas compares 2024 and 2025 estimates inside Census Vintage 2025. It does not compute 2010 to 2025 growth across the Vintage 2019 and Vintage 2025 seam, because those series use different base methodologies.

Read the full methodology · Open the Census source file page