Every City in the USA

Census Vintage 2025 · City growth atlas

2025 U.S. City Growth Atlas

Census Vintage 2025 population estimates for 19,483 U.S. cities and places, reference date July 1, 2025. A national percentage-change map, resident-count comparison map, fastest growth, biggest numeric gains, state briefs, milestone crossings, and reusable downloads for reporters and editors.

For reporters: the ZIP includes PNG/SVG maps, chart exports, captions, alt text, source manifest, data dictionary, and CSVs.

Read before using

Reporter trust notes

What the numbers are

These are Census Bureau Vintage 2025 July 1 population estimates. The Census embargo notice listed Thursday, May 14, 2026 at 12:01 a.m. ET as the public release time for the city and town estimates.

The Atlas compares July 1, 2024 and July 1, 2025 estimates inside the same vintage. It is not a net-migration table, a decennial count, or a long-run trend line.

How to cite it

Cite the Census Bureau as the primary source for population estimates. Cite Every City in the USA when using our rankings, maps, state packets, chart exports, or joined story leads.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates. Graphics and analysis: Every City in the USA. Reuse allowed under CC BY 4.0; note if modified.

Universe and map count

This page contains 19,483 city/place rows and the all-city map draws 19,483 dots. Clean contiguous U.S. crops omit Alaska and Hawaii by design.

The Census city/town release includes multiple local-government geography types; this Atlas uses the site's processed city/place universe. See methodology before using it as a geography-definition source.

Official context: Census city/town estimate release notice · Vintage 2025 release notes · site methodology.

Where city populations changed fastest by percentage

Featured map · circle area = percent change

This lead view scales each city dot by one-year percentage change instead of residents gained or lost. It surfaces small-base places that barely register on the resident-count map, so use it alongside population and numeric change.

Map of U.S. cities with green dots for one-year percentage population gains, rust dots for one-year percentage population declines, and gray dots for cities with no one-year change.
Percentage change is calculated as 2025 population minus 2024 population, divided by 2024 population. Small populations can produce visually large percentage swings from modest numeric changes.
AnnotatedAll-city percentage-change mapEvery mapped city: color shows direction and circle area shows one-year percent changeSVGPNG
16:9 cleanContiguous U.S. percentage hero map16:9 clean crop scaled by percent change, with no labels, legend, Alaska, or HawaiiSVGPNG
1200x630Contiguous U.S. percentage social map1200 by 630 clean crop for social cards and article thumbnailsSVGPNG
1:1 cleanContiguous U.S. percentage square mapSquare clean crop for embeds and social variantsSVGPNG
% gainsPercentage gainers emphasis mapPercentage population gains highlighted; flat and declining cities shown as gray contextSVGPNG
% declinesPercentage declines emphasis mapPercentage population declines highlighted; flat and growing cities shown as gray contextSVGPNG
5%+ movesLarge percentage moves mapOnly cities that gained or lost at least 5% from 2024 to 2025SVGPNG

Compare that with resident-count change

19,483 mapped cities · circle area = residents

The resident-count map uses the same city dots and colors, but circle area shows the number of residents added or lost. Large cities and high absolute moves dominate this view, which is why it reads differently from the percentage map.

PercentageArea shows one-year percent changeSmall fast-moving cities become visible, including large percentage gains and losses.
Resident countArea shows residents gained or lostLarge cities and high absolute moves dominate this view.
Map of U.S. cities with green dots for one-year population gains, rust dots for one-year population declines, and gray dots for cities with no one-year change.
Total population change includes births, deaths, and migration; it is not a net-migration measure.
AnnotatedAll-city gain/loss mapEvery mapped city: green gain, rust decline, gray no one-year changeSVGPNG
16:9 cleanContiguous U.S. hero map16:9 clean crop with no labels, legend, Alaska, or HawaiiSVGPNG
1200x630Contiguous U.S. social map1200 by 630 clean crop for social cards and article thumbnailsSVGPNG
1:1 cleanContiguous U.S. square mapSquare clean crop for embeds and social variantsSVGPNG
GainsGainers emphasis mapPopulation gains highlighted; flat and declining cities shown as gray contextSVGPNG
DeclinesDeclines emphasis mapPopulation declines highlighted; flat and growing cities shown as gray contextSVGPNG
1k+ movesLarge moves mapOnly cities that gained or lost at least 1,000 residents from 2024 to 2025SVGPNG

State map sets

50 states · 4 exports each

Pick a state to load its clean percentage-change lead map plus annotated percentage and resident-count alternatives. Circle areas are scaled within each state; use the national maps above for cross-state visual scale.

Alabama AL

463 mapped cities
Alabama clean city population percentage-change map, with green dots for gains, rust dots for declines, and gray dots for no one-year change.
Clean %Percent cleanSVGPNG
Annotated %Percent annotatedTitle, source, legend, and percentage-scaled city dots.SVGPNG
Clean #Resident cleanShape and dots only; circle area shows residents gained or lost.SVGPNG
Annotated #Resident annotatedTitle, source, legend, and resident-count-scaled city dots.SVGPNG

Top findings

Fastest growth, biggest gain, milestone watch

Fastest over 20k

Celina, TX

+24.6%

51,717 to 64,427, a one-year change of +12,710.

Biggest numeric gain

Charlotte, NC

+20,731

944,053 to 964,784 from July 2024 to July 2025.

Milestone watch

6 crossings

Austin, TX crossed 1,000,000. Raleigh, NC crossed 500,000. Longmont, CO, Edmond, OK, Avondale, AZ crossed 100,000. Garland, TX fell below 250,000.

Find your local angle

Assignment desk starting points

The fastest way in is local: pick a state, compare the biggest positive gainer with the fastest qualifying city, then check milestones and one-year declines before pitching a growth story.

State briefs for local follow-up

50 states + DC · per-state CSVs

A per-state summary built for assignment editors: fastest qualifying city, biggest positive numeric gainer, largest current city, largest one-year decline where present, and a state-specific CSV for local sorting.

StateCitiesFastest over 20kGrowthBiggest gainAddedLargest declineLostState data
Alabama463Foley+7.8%Madison+4,157Birmingham-896CSV
Alaska149Juneau+0.1%Bethel+269Anchorage-214CSV
Arizona91Queen Creek+8.2%Surprise+7,702Tucson-2,262CSV
Arkansas501Centerton+5.7%Fayetteville+2,908Pine Bluff-540CSV
California483Lathrop+4.7%San Diego+5,874Los Angeles-3,621CSV
Colorado272Johnstown+8.4%Colorado Springs+2,288Centennial-1,154CSV
Connecticut30Norwalk+0.8%New Haven+886Meriden-52CSV
Delaware57Middletown+1.0%Milford+649Newark-63CSV
District of Columbia1Washington+0.3%Washington+2,335n/an/aCSV
Florida411Haines City+10.0%Port St. Lucie+9,131Hialeah-2,210CSV
Georgia538Canton+7.0%Atlanta+8,350Athens-829CSV
Hawaii1Honolulu-0.2%n/an/aHonolulu-523CSV
Idaho198Kuna+8.4%Caldwell+3,452Hailey-93CSV
Illinois1,294Lockport+3.4%Chicago+5,253Decatur-524CSV
Indiana566Westfield+5.3%Westfield+3,341Hammond-305CSV
Iowa939Waukee+9.3%Waukee+2,963Spencer-227CSV
Kansas625Junction City+2.4%Olathe+1,361Leavenworth-230CSV
Kentucky418Elizabethtown+2.8%Lexington-Fayette urban county+2,680Hopkinsville-450CSV
Louisiana305Hammond+2.9%Baton Rouge+1,255New Orleans-1,323CSV
Maine23Auburn+0.8%Auburn+210Presque Isle-59CSV
Maryland157Frederick+3.0%Frederick+2,713Gaithersburg-432CSV
Massachusetts58Everett+4.6%Everett+2,362Boston-1,338CSV
Michigan533East Lansing+1.3%Detroit+5,060Dearborn-405CSV
Minnesota856Rosemount+4.2%Rosemount+1,299Eagan-222CSV
Mississippi299Gulfport+2.2%Gulfport+1,624Jackson-846CSV
Missouri936Republic+5.9%Kansas City+4,681St. Louis-2,301CSV
Montana127Kalispell+2.0%Missoula+718Billings-206CSV
Nebraska528Norfolk+1.3%Lincoln+2,257Omaha-450CSV
Nevada19Fernley+2.7%Henderson+5,379Boulder City-70CSV
New Hampshire13Dover+2.1%Dover+720Keene-47CSV
New Jersey323Fair Lawn+2.4%Newark+3,646Camden-249CSV
New Mexico105Rio Rancho+1.8%Rio Rancho+1,972Albuquerque-2,290CSV
New York594Kiryas Joel+6.6%Kiryas Joel+2,933New York-12,196CSV
North Carolina549Monroe+6.2%Charlotte+20,731Asheville-1,626CSV
North Dakota355Williston+2.4%Fargo+1,088Valley City-61CSV
Ohio924Grove City+2.9%Columbus+7,696Toledo-962CSV
Oklahoma591El Reno+3.3%Oklahoma City+6,104Enid-232CSV
Oregon240Woodburn+4.9%Woodburn+1,495McMinnville-556CSV
Pennsylvania1,014Chambersburg+1.5%Philadelphia+1,546Erie-449CSV
Rhode Island8Warwick+0.9%Providence+1,068Newport-161CSV
South Carolina271Greer+7.3%Greer+3,412Mount Pleasant-518CSV
South Dakota310Brookings+2.0%Sioux Falls+3,862Vermillion-123CSV
Tennessee345Lebanon+5.6%Nashville+9,281Memphis-4,575CSV
Texas1,224Celina+24.6%Fort Worth+19,512El Paso-2,219CSV
Utah255Eagle Mountain+8.5%Eagle Mountain+5,195Orem-1,128CSV
Vermont39Burlington-0.3%Essex Junction+217South Burlington-184CSV
Virginia227Fairfax+2.8%Richmond+2,450Danville-311CSV
Washington281Kirkland+3.0%Seattle+11,572Airway Heights-128CSV
West Virginia230Morgantown-0.1%Ranson corporation+809Wheeling-322CSV
Wisconsin608Middleton+2.6%Madison+1,955Milwaukee-915CSV
Wyoming99Cheyenne+1.1%Cheyenne+734Rock Springs-79CSV

For all states in one file, use the state reporter packets CSV.

Two ways to rank growth

Percent change and raw residents added

Milestone crossings

6 threshold crossings

Cities that crossed a round-number population threshold between the 2024 and 2025 estimates.

Crossed above 100,000

Edmond, OK

99,101 to 100,479 (+1,378).

Crossed above 100,000

Avondale, AZ

96,646 to 100,983 (+4,337).

Fell below 250,000

Garland, TX

251,034 to 249,625 (-1,409).

Crossed above 500,000

Raleigh, NC

499,017 to 506,306 (+7,289).

Crossed above 1,000,000

Austin, TX

998,607 to 1,002,632 (+4,025).

Declines and rebounds

Large-city declines and one-year reversals

Comedown to comeback

Cities with at least 50,000 residents in 2025 that declined from 2023 to 2024, then gained population from 2024 to 2025.

City2023 to 20242024 to 2025Swing
Peoria, AZ-24+2,146+2,170
Tempe, AZ-818+1,195+2,013
Richardson, TX-762+570+1,332
Bloomington, IN-519+727+1,246
Ann Arbor, MI-438+786+1,224

Rank movement worth checking

Top 100 current or prior population ranks

Moved down 4 ranks

Hialeah, FL

#98 in 2024 to #102 in 2025.

Moved down 2 ranks

Irving, TX

#89 in 2024 to #91 in 2025.

Story leads reporters can localize

Census V2025 joined to official context datasets

These are assignment-ready angles, not causal claims. Each lead pairs the new city growth estimates with one official context dataset and carries its caveat beside the chart idea.

01

Opportunity + broadband

Growth cities with WFH and broadband context

Three high-income growth cities where work-from-home shares clear 35% and provider-reported gigabit availability is high. This is context for reporting, not a causal explanation for growth.

  • Celina, TX: +276.8% since 2020, +24.6% in one year, 35.8% WFH, $170,894 median household income, 88.2% gigabit availability.
  • Frisco, TX has 37.8% WFH and 90.3% gigabit; Redmond, WA has 38.4% WFH and 99.1% gigabit.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS 2020-2024, FCC BDC 2025-12-31. FCC is provider-reported availability, not adoption, speed, or price; this does not prove remote work caused growth.

Chart comparing Celina, Frisco, and Redmond across population growth, work-from-home share, median household income, and gigabit availability.
Opportunity stack strips: growth, WFH share, income, and gigabit availability.SVGPNG
Celina portraitSVG · PNG in media kitFrisco portraitSVG · PNG in media kitRedmond portraitSVG · PNG in media kit
02

Affordability

Regional lower-cost fast-growth candidates outside Texas

A counterpoint to the Texas growth story: fast-growing cities in regions where BEA price levels still sit below the national average.

  • Centerton, AR: +52.1% since 2020, all-items RPP 91.4, rent RPP 76.9, cash-rent burden 26.4%, home-value-to-income 2.9.
  • Waukee, IA: +45.7% since 2020, all-items RPP 91.7, rent RPP 84.7, cash-rent burden 32.9%, home-value-to-income 3.5.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS 2020-2024, BEA 2024 RPP. RPP is metro or state-nonmetro geography, not city-level affordability.

Chart comparing Centerton and Waukee across growth, regional price parity, cash-rent burden, and home-value-to-income ratios.
Growth vs. affordability quadrant with a U.S. = 100 RPP reference line.SVGPNG
Centerton portraitSVG · PNG in media kitWaukee portraitSVG · PNG in media kit
03

Climate context

Fast growth in heat-risk geography

Phoenix-area cities kept adding residents in places where July normal highs clear 105 F and FEMA risk context is very high.

  • Goodyear, AZ: +7,690 residents (+6.5%), July normal high 105.5 F, Maricopa County FEMA NRI 99.9.
  • Buckeye, AZ added +6,552 (+5.5%) at a 106.3 F July normal high; Surprise, AZ added +7,702 (+4.6%) at 105.2 F.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, NOAA 1991-2020 normals, FEMA NRI. This is context, not a forecast or property-level risk claim.

Chart comparing Goodyear, Buckeye, and Surprise across one-year population gain, FEMA heat-wave risk, and NOAA July maximum temperature normals.
Heat-growth grid: one-year population gain with July normal-high overlay.SVGPNG
Goodyear portraitSVG · PNG in media kitBuckeye portraitSVG · PNG in media kitSurprise portraitSVG · PNG in media kit
04

Housing pressure

Big-city growth with shelter-cost context

Large numeric gainers do not share the same affordability reality once rent burden, home-value-to-income ratios, and regional rent prices are layered in.

  • Charlotte added +20,731 residents with 47.8% cash-rent burden, home-value-to-income 4.7, and rent RPP 97.6.
  • Fort Worth added +19,512 with 53.7% cash-rent burden and rent RPP 117.9; Seattle added +11,572 with 42.4% cash-rent burden, rent RPP 151.3, and home-value-to-income 7.6.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS 2020-2024, BEA RPP. BEA RPP is regional, not city-grain; population growth alone does not measure housing shortage.

Chart comparing Charlotte, Fort Worth, and Seattle across one-year population gain, cash-rent burden, home-value-to-income, and rent RPP.
Ranked housing-stress bars beside one-year population gain.SVGPNG
Charlotte portraitSVG · PNG in media kitFort Worth portraitSVG · PNG in media kitSeattle portraitSVG · PNG in media kit
05

Commute context

Exurban growth with long-commute context

Growth in commuter exurbs becomes a daily time-burden story when a large share of non-WFH workers report 60-minute-plus trips.

  • Menifee, CA grew +15.7% since 2020 with 25.4% of non-WFH commuters at 60+ minutes; Manteca, CA grew +15.7% with 25.0%.
  • Kyle, TX grew +53.0% since 2020, with 16.2% at 60+ minutes and 2.9% city LAUS unemployment.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025, ACS commute tables, BLS LAUS. ACS commute time excludes WFH workers and carries margins of error.

Chart comparing Menifee, Manteca, and Kyle across 2020 to 2025 population growth and 60-minute-plus commute shares among non-work-from-home commuters.
Commute pressure ladder for non-WFH workers.SVGPNG
Menifee portraitSVG · PNG in media kitManteca portraitSVG · PNG in media kitKyle portraitSVG · PNG in media kit
06

High-income suburbs

High-income suburbs that lost residents

A clean localizable counter-story: affluent suburbs can still post one-year population declines. Local reporting should test whether housing age, prices, household size, or estimate noise is part of the explanation.

  • Thousand Oaks, CA lost 1,387 residents from 2024 to 2025 with ACS median household income of $135,603.
  • Sugar Land, TX lost 1,211; Huntington Beach, CA lost 1,168; Centennial, CO lost 1,154.
  • Carlsbad, Santa Clarita, Redondo Beach, and Newport Beach also show high household incomes beside one-year losses.

Site-derived lead. Sources: Census V2025 and ACS 2020-2024 median household income. One-year decline is total estimated population change, not a migration count or causal housing claim.

Chart ranking Thousand Oaks, Sugar Land, Huntington Beach, Centennial, Carlsbad, Santa Clarita, Redondo Beach, and Newport Beach by one-year population loss and median household income.
Ranked loss-and-income bars for eight high-income suburban cities.SVGPNG
Thousand Oaks portraitSVG · PNG in media kitSugar Land portraitSVG · PNG in media kitHuntington Beach portraitSVG · PNG in media kitCentennial portraitSVG · PNG in media kitCarlsbad portraitSVG · PNG in media kitSanta Clarita portraitSVG · PNG in media kitRedondo Beach portraitSVG · PNG in media kitNewport Beach portraitSVG · PNG in media kit

Source links

Reporter downloads

Grouped by newsroom use

Files reflect the same Vintage 2025 release as the full dataset. Use the data dictionary and source manifest when auditing fields or explaining joined context datasets to an editor.

Graphics desks

Use SVG for editing and PNG for fast CMS drops.

Free reuse and attribution

Every City in the USA graphics, rankings, story leads, and copy blocks on this page may be copied, republished, cropped, resized, modified, translated, and used commercially under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Attribution can be any reasonable credit for the medium. For online use, our suggested default links to https://www.everycityintheusa.com/atlas/2025-us-city-growth/ and to the license. You may edit the attribution or add rel="nofollow" or another rel value to match your publishing policy. A link that passes ranking credit is not required. If you alter a graphic or excerpt, note that it was modified. Keep the Census source, Vintage 2025 label, reference date, and one-year estimate caveat with the material.

Suggested credit: Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates. Graphics and analysis: Every City in the USA, licensed CC BY 4.0.

Reporter kit

Suggested attribution and reusable copy blocks

Methodology note

All figures come from the U.S. Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program, Vintage 2025 city and place file, with a reference date of July 1, 2025. Percent-growth tables are limited to cities with at least 20,000 residents in the 2024 estimate to avoid small-base distortions. All comparisons are within the Vintage 2025 series, so 2024 and 2025 figures are directly comparable.

Caveat: These are total population change figures from a single Census estimate vintage. They are not migration counts, and a one-year change is not a trend.

Do not say: “moved in,” “migration surge,” or “official fastest-growing city in America” unless your story independently supports that wording. The Atlas ranks a documented slice of the Census release.

Copy-paste lede templates

{CITY}, {STATE} added {NUMERIC_CHANGE} residents between July 2024 and July 2025, reaching {POP_2025}, according to Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates.

{CITY}, {STATE} grew {PERCENT_CHANGE} from July 2024 to July 2025 among cities with at least 20,000 residents in the 2024 estimate.

{CITY}, {STATE} crossed {THRESHOLD} residents in the Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates, reaching {POP_2025} as of July 1, 2025.

{CITY}, {STATE} recorded a one-year population decline of {NUMERIC_DECLINE}, from {POP_2024} in 2024 to {POP_2025} in 2025.

In {STATE}, the fastest-growing city over 20,000 residents was {CITY}, which grew {PERCENT_CHANGE} from 2024 to 2025.

Share graphic briefs

Static chart copy for social and newsletters

Methodology · read before comparing

Within-vintage growth only.

The Atlas compares 2024 and 2025 estimates inside Census Vintage 2025. It does not compute 2010 to 2025 growth across the Vintage 2019 and Vintage 2025 seam, because those series use different base methodologies.

Read the full methodology · Open the Census source file page